Who are my links – FantasyFilmscapes.com

FantasyFilmscapes.com is a webzine run by Iain and several of his friends. We have collaberated several times on reviews: Dragon, Dragon Dynasty, and Grendel.

Although the site has been less active recently due to Iain moving to Europe and entering school, there is still the big archive of reviews, trailers, and stills to keep one digging through for hours. I still remain in contact with Iain from time to time due to both of our very busy schedules, and he is currently enrolled in film school in the Czech Republic. Despite that, maybe one day we will be able to team up again as it is fun to work with similarly minded people. Check out FantasyFilmscapes if you have the time.

Plants do what Jamie Lynn Spears cannot

Plants have developed the ability to mutually become abstinent. And this is without that terrible government funded program that does nothing but create ignorant children who don’t know how babies are formed. If only Jamie Lynn Spears had a similar gene, the maybe she’d be able to grow up and follow her sister’s footsteps into a downward spiral. Instead, she never even got to take off. I shall use the genes from these plants to create insertions that can be used on child stars to prevent them from raising a new generation of horrible monsters. Saving the world one Spears at a time.

Biologists Find Unusual Plant Gene: Abstinence By Mutual Consent

ScienceDaily (Dec. 26, 2007) — Biologists at the University of California, San Diego have discovered a gene in plants that disrupts fertilization only when mutations in the gene are present in both the female and male reproductive cells. Their discovery has been named the “abstinence by mutual consent” mutation because of its unusual properties.

“Mutations that do not allow fertilization are known in plants, but usually these mutations are caused either by a mutation in the female reproductive cells or by a mutation in the male reproductive cells,” said Julian Schroeder, a professor of biological sciences at UCSD who headed the study. “In this gene, when only the female carries the mutation, completely normal fertilization occurs, and when only the male carries the mutation, fertilization also occurs. But fertilization is completely disrupted when both male and female reproductive cells carry the mutation simultaneously.”

The scientists say the discovery of new genes that control the ability of plants to undergo fertilization could have important applications to plant breeders and conservationists.

“Mutations that cause infertility in crops can provide a powerful tool for breeders who would like to avoid crossing of their plants to related species,” said Aurelien Boisson-Dernier, a postdoctoral scholar in Schroeder’s UCSD laboratory and the first author of the study. “Conversely breeders would at times like to breed crops by crossing them into distantly related species that however do not allow crossing due to infertility. For example, adding beneficial stress resistance genes from another species may not be possible if the male and female reproductive cells can’t communicate properly. Understanding the mechanisms that mediate male-female communication during fertilization could help in circumventing the barrier of such interspecies crosses for breeding new varieties.”

In animals and plants, fertilization relies on complex and specialized mechanisms that allow the precise delivery of the male reproductive sperm cell to the female egg cell. Fertilization requires fusion of the sperm and egg cells. In flowering plants, the male pollen tube carries sperm cells through the maternal tissues to deliver the sperm to the female reproductive cells. Once the pollen tube gets close to the egg cells, fertilization requires the bursting of the pollen tube. This pollen tube bursting expels sperm cells from inside the pollen tube, so sperm can then fertilize the female reproductive cell.

In investigating why the mutation they discovered caused disruption of fertilization in the mustard plant Arabidopsis, the scientists found that the pollen tubes did not burst when they came close to the female egg cells. So in the mutant plants, the sperm cells were not expelled from the pollen tubes toward the female cells. Instead the pollen tubes, in which the sperm reside, kept growing past the eggs cells.

“The abstinence by mutual consent gene is the first gene identified so far with a critical function at the same time in both plant male and female reproductive cells that is essential for the delivery of sperm cells to the egg cell,” said Boisson-Dernier.

“The abstinence by mutual consent mutant pollen just acts as if there were no egg cell around and keeps on growing,” Schroeder added. “It’s interesting because this lack of pollen bursting only happens if the mutation is carried by both the male and female, suggesting the abstinence by mutual consent gene somehow allows the male pollen and the female reproductive cells to talk to one another.”

Boisson-Dernier found that the gene is responsible for producing a protein called peroxin that targets small organelles inside the cell called peroxisomes. Within the cell, peroxisomes are small organelles whose main functions are metabolizing fatty acids, protecting the cell from toxic free radicals and also generating a large range of signaling molecules.

Boisson-Dernier’s discovery demonstrated that peroxisomes play an unexpected key role in the dialogue between the male sperm carrier and the female egg cells. It also implies, the UCSD researchers say, that a diffusible signal generated in the peroxisomes of either the female or male reproductive cells is enough to allow the male-female communication to proceed. This signal coming from the peroxisomes of the male or female is sufficient to set off the eruption of the pollen tube allowing the sperm cells to be released.

“The interesting next question is, what is the signal coming from peroxisomes that causes pollen tube bursting?” said Schroeder.

Boisson-Dernier added, “Why does this signal only cause bursting of the pollen tubes once the pollen tube gets close to the female reproductive cells? These findings actually suggest there may be a second signal or a second key that is needed so the pollen only bursts when male and female are in close vicinity of one another.”

This research is detailed in a paper that appears online December 20 in the journal Current Biology.

Squirrels beginning worship of serpent god Set

Dr. Mobusu here with important news on the front of ancient deities from literary barbarian stories. It would seem that the serpent god Set is not content to be worshipped only by James Earl Jones, but has spread his influence to the local squirrel populations of California. The Golden State is long known to be home of a bunch of fruits and nuts, so a crazed cult growing up there is not news. What is news is that the cult is perpetuated by little furry rodents. Once again, ignorant scientist misinterpret the data thinking the squirrels are masking themselves, not knowing that instead the furry ones are declaring their allegiance to the serpent god. Only when Set’s seven-headed self enters our dimension to devour the living will they know the truth. But I won’t have that happen on my watch, this world belongs to me and no snake god will be eating anyone without my written permission. Suck it, Set!

Squirrels Use Old Snake Skins To Mask Their Scent From Predators

ScienceDaily (Dec. 25, 2007) — California ground squirrels and rock squirrels chew up rattlesnake skin and smear it on their fur to mask their scent from predators, according to a new study by researchers at UC Davis.

Barbara Clucas, a graduate student in animal behavior at UC Davis, observed ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) and rock squirrels (Spermophilus variegates) applying snake scent to themselves by picking up pieces of shed snakeskin, chewing it and then licking their fur.

Adult female squirrels and juveniles apply snake scent more often than adult males, which are less vulnerable to predation by snakes, Clucas said. The scent probably helps to mask the squirrel’s own scent, especially when the animals are asleep in their burrows at night, or to persuade a snake that another snake is in the burrow.

The squirrels are not limited to the use of shed snake skins, said Donald Owings, a professor of psychology at UC Davis who is Clucas’ adviser and an author on the paper. They also pick up snake odor from soil and other surfaces on which snakes have been resting, and use that to apply scent. Other rodents have been observed using similar behavior.

Snake-scent application is one of a remarkable package of defenses that squirrels use against rattlesnakes, Owings said. In earlier work, Owings’ lab has found that squirrels can: heat up their tails to send a warning signal to rattlesnakes, which can “see” in the infrared; assess how dangerous a particular snake is, based on the sound of its rattle; and display assertive behavior against snakes to deter attacks. In addition, work by Owings’ colleague, psychology professor Richard Coss, has demonstrated that these squirrels have evolved resistance to snake venom.

“It’s a nice example of the opportunism of animals,” Owings said. “They’re turning the tables on the snake.”

The other authors on the paper, which was published Nov. 28 in the journal Animal Behavior, are Matthew Rowe, Sam Houston State University, Texas, and Patricia Arrowood at New Mexico State University. The work was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Animal Behavior Society.

New Review – Roundhay Garden Scene

We got a new review of the first movie ever made! Only 2.11 seconds long, but long enough for us to go after. Expect no mercy, and thanks to everyone being dead no one will be sending us angry emails that we didn’t love their film. Complete with the entire film as a movie clip! Read it today.


Next up will be real movies, I swear!

Roundhay Garden Scene

Roundhay Garden Scene (Review)

Roundhay Garden Scene


1888
Directed by Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince

Roundhay Garden Scene is one of those movies that you hear about but just need to experience. It is a visual sensation unlike any other. Oh, wait, no it’s not, it is just some people walking around for two seconds. However, as it is the earliest film made, it has a place in history that no other film can match. That will not save it from getting its just desserts here on TarsTarkas.NET!

Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince – The director isn’t getting out of this easily. He has a long name, and that’s just ridiculous. Plus, he’s French. The biggest thing is how he went and vanished off the face of the Earth. Yep, he did a Houdini, except didn’t bother to make himself reappear. Many people have speculated what happened to him after he disappeared on a train in 1890, but a photo found in 2003 in the Paris police archives of a drowning victim looks a lot like Le Prince, so we’ll just call it case closed. Obviously he drowned on a train.
Adolphe Le Prince – Director Louis Le Prince’s son has the most prominant part in the film, walking about like a thing that walks about. Adolphe Le Prince was named for the famed German dictator thanks to his father’s other famous invention, the time machine. Le Prince also shares his father’s interest in having a mysterious death, because he turned up shot dead in 1902 in Fire Island, New York while duck hunting. Called a suicide, he was actually secretly murdered by Thomas Edison over the Equity 6928 brief. (Look it up!)
Sarah Robinson Whitley – This black-coat wearing old biddy is walking backwards, showing that even the earliest film has failed jokes. This joke was so bad it proved to be her undoing, as on October 24, 1888 (ten days after being filmed) she died at age 72. She was director Le Prince’s mother-in-law.
Joseph Whitley – His coattails are flapping because he’s a dancing fool! Joseph Whitley is also director Le Prince’s father-in-law, which would make him the husband of Sarah Robinson Whitley, and he seems awfully happy for someone who is about to be a widower in ten days. Very suspicious.
Harriet Hartley – Virtually nothing is known about this woman. Therefore, we will make stuff up. Harriet Hartley was the long-lost cousin of Harriet Tubman, she escaped on the Underground Railroad all the way to France. Hartley was instrumental in the dissolution of the Prussian government in post-WW1 Europe, and even discovered the element Hafnium. Hartley was killed in a tragic dirigible accident when someone thought it would be a good idea to bring a chimp on a dirigible.

Some people think I’m crazy for going after a 119-year-old film with no sound. “It’s the first film made, cut it some slack!” they insist. Well, they’re wrong, why should it get a free pass just because no one knew what they were doing back then? They should have known better! Director Louis Aimé Augustin Le Prince should have considered his role in cinematic history, and the fact that generations later we would still have to look at the mess he made! Garbage, complete garbage! Where is the plot? The characterizations? The color? The sound? The length beyond two seconds? Is this what passed for entertainment in 1888, right before you died of the pocks or consumption? Well, those ragamuffins and mudsill who spend their coppers to see some moving pictures deserve better. Maybe someone should use an Arkansas toothpick to give someone Jesse, which would add some excitement to the film. That would make it a huckleberry above a persimmon, instead folks are likely to go to the quilting bee or the husking frolic.

Sorry for slipping into 19th century slang there for a moment, feel free to Google those terms to find out I wasn’t just honey-fuggling you with nonsense vocabulary. So the film is basically just Adolphe Le Prince walking while Sarah, Joseph, and Harriet mill about in the background. Filmed on October 14th, 1888, it was recorded on 1885 Eastman Kodak paper base photographic film with Le Prince’s single-lens combi camera-projector. The original film does not survive, all current prints are copies made around 1930, so this is like a second generation VHS dub. Bootleg city. Not that I would ever do that.

Le Prince’s disappearance pretty much set the stage for Edison to become the only person people think of when they think of who invented the movies. It is very suspicious. One would think Edison invented the first light bulb just so he could have it flash on above his head as he got the idea to have Le Prince have an “accident.” All the mysterious deaths surrounding this film is just proof that the movie industry was created morally bankrupt, and it’s been downhill from there!

That’s it, it is history, and we are all better for it. Without Roundhay Garden Scene we wouldn’t have Casablanca. We wouldn’t have The Marx Brothers. We wouldn’t have King Kong. We wouldn’t have Shark Attack 3: Megalodon. We wouldn’t have Catman in Boxers Blow. Damn you, Le Prince!

Director Le Prince went on to make Leeds Bridge, which was a failure at the box office and began the movie slump of 1888. The MPAA blamed internet downloaders and their iKinetoscopes.

Thanks to the magic of public domain, you can watch this classic film in its entirety!


[flowplayer id=”23419″]

And when you’re done with that, check out all these neat remixes done by the Something Awful Forums! Roundhay Garden Scene Deleted Scenes

Rated 4/10 (Roundhay, Garden, Scene, 1888)


Please give feedback below!

Email us and tell us how much we suck!

More examples of my growth ray in action! – Giant Cobras!

In addition to the giant rats, I have also succeeded in creating giant cobras because that’s just what I do – make things big or small for no reason. I’m a mad scientist, what do you expect? Naja Ashei is just the beginning!

Record-size spitting cobra found in Kenya

By Nicolo Gnecchi Fri Dec 7, 1:21 PM ET

NAIROBI (Reuters) – A new species of giant spitting cobra, measuring nearly nine feet and possessing enough venom to kill at least 15 people, has been discovered in Kenya, a conservation group said on Friday.

WildlifeDirect said the cobras were the world’s largest and had been identified as unique. The species has been named Naja Ashei after James Ashe, who founded Bio-Ken snake farm on Kenya’s tropical coast where the gigantic serpents are found.

“A new species of giant spitting cobra is exciting and reinforces the obvious — that there have to be many other unreported species but hundreds are being lost as their habitats disappear under the continued mismanagement of our planet,” said the group’s chairman, Kenyan environmentalist Richard Leakey.

Ashe, now deceased, was the first to catch a larger-than-normal spitting cobra in the 1960s and suggest it belonged to a different species.

Bio-Ken director Royjan Taylor said the recognition of the new species was an opportunity to raise awareness about snake conservation as well as find remedies for the powerful bite.

“Naja Ashei is responsible for a very serious snake bite,” he told Reuters by telephone from the farm. “People don’t care about saving snakes. They talk of saving dolphins or cats, but never snakes!”

The conservationists’ excitement has drawn scientific endorsement from a British-based biologist.

Research published by Wolfgang Wuster, of the University of Wales, said a field visit confirmed the Naja Ashei is a new species. “The new species is diagnosable from all other African spitting cobras by the possession of a unique DNA,” he wrote in a review in July.